V6R1. Asked: March 13, AM Last updated: March 17, AM defined by source statements, similar to creating a CL or RPG program. With the exception of providing an ILE CL compiler in V3R1, very little about the operating .. that could be passed into a CL program, or passed out when the CL program called (or transferred V6R1 — CL Compiler (continued). • Support. Programming, CL, V6R1 CL: The Story Continues, Bruce Vining, os/, i5/os, IBM i, iseries, as/, system i, Control Language (CL), Declare.
|Published (Last):||11 February 2016|
|PDF File Size:||18.31 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The one I posted first just retrieves it.
ILE C also sets one of the other return codes. The decimal value indicates the status of called programs. CRPence 1, 6 I don’t know much about the “Product Return Code”. I think that warning might apply to any of those return programminb.
This page talks about the Product Return Code along with a warning in the last bullet about how c6r1 might not be reliable. The return code is set by these programs before they return to the programs that call them.
I don’t think there’s any language that has implicit “return by reference”. The following, as the most likely method capable, documents nothing about the ability to change the Return Code: Sign up using Email and Password.
%CHAR built-in function
Email Required, but never shown.
IBM ILE CL NULL Pointer Support Added at Release V6R1 – United States
Post as a guest Name. Barbara Morris 1, 4 5. Sign up using Facebook. This field is scoped to the job and represents the most recent return code set by any thread within the job.
Missing from the above list is CL compilers or CL; as well, any mention of DFU programs and the Sort Utility feature, which are both mentioned in the prior included doc reference. However, you can retrieve the current value of the return code as set by another program in lrogramming CL program. My RPG version worked splendidly.
As such, coding that CL is not an option in v5r3. The importance of consistency in naming seems all-too-often overlooked within IBM: The return code indicates the completion status of the last program of these types progranming has completed processing within the job, as follows: If nothing else [likely, as the most probable response will be the undesirable recommendation to “Write a program with system-state to modify the value Although the compiler may inadvertently set the Product RC when it returns since it’s written in C.
Refer to the appropriate ILE-conforming language manual for possible values.
%CHAR built-in function in CL
OK, but only as returned by other programs and compilers, not what was the effective return code of the CL procedure or program I just called!