Written as an afterword to this work, Concluding Unscientific Postscript is on one level a philosophical jest, yet on another it is Climacus’s characterization of the. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Danish: Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler) is an work by. One of the most noteworthy features of Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript: A Critical Guide is that it lives up to its subtitle.
|Published (Last):||10 June 2008|
|PDF File Size:||13.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Are they distinguished as metaphysical terms, picking out realities that differ by grade or degree of being, or are they value designations, or both? To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Aesthetically, it is a masterpiece: If all you’re interested in is the main text, purchase vol.
The Sickness Unto Death: It is a colossal achievement. Jan 14, Anju Mai rated it liked it. English Choose a language for shopping.
Postscrkpt sure, Kierkegaard does say that truth involves, even necessarily, a degree of “objective uncertainty”, postscrippt that, objectively speaking, that which one believes to be the truth unscientiific well turn out to be mistaken. In the name of Christian faith Kierkegaard rejected not this or that element in Hegelianism but the whole, referring to it in mockery as c the System.
It was an attack on what Kierkegaard saw as Hegel’s deterministic philosophy. And yet this may also be the highest earnestness. Kierkegaard intended Postscript to be his concluding work as an author. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. Justin rated it it was amazing Apr 26, It takes, as he admits, a store of humor to contend with any great dialectician–and I would say that all dialecticians the professional and the dilettante is, in his heart, a comedian.
Finally — in a grand show of obedience to this same principle — the book ends by revoking itself in an appendix See all 19 reviews. His virtue, for the reader, is that he sees the way to the top, while his value depends on his not having got there; for then he would have disappeared from view” xvii. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. As Mooney puts it, Farewells are exchanged in the confidence that the sun will rise, that we will awake, that the world will return, that our friends will not enter the grave in the night — even as we know that a final farewell awaits, when there will be no tomorrow, when we will not awake, when the beloved will not return Return to Book Page.
In accordance with the spirit of existentialism, nothing is imposed upon an individual; we are all confronted with an ubearable necessity of making our own choices, either within a binary alternative Kierkegaard’s position or among many possible alternatives unsientific century’s thinkers. This attitude is commendable because, at least, in it one no longer dodges what one really is – a finite existence, and hence sins much oierkegaard than those who do.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
S. Kierkegaard Concluding Unscientific | Valentina Cizmar –
In this decision-making process – that is almost never about the facts but always about the value – lay elements of objective knowledgeintersubjective axiological truths and subjective emotions provenance. Here is where Concluding Postscript comes in. Hannay’s translation is the first to retain this crucial nuance. This page was last edited on 30 Decemberat Kierkegaard’s text of Concluding Unscientific Postscript is vol.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript by Søren Kierkegaard
Familiar Kierkegaardian potscript are introduced in the work, including truth as subjectivity, indirect Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript is a classic of existential literature.
For one thing I had in fact learned very early that there are men kierketaard seem to be selected for suffering, and, for another thing, I was conscious of having sinned much and therefore supposed that Christianity had to appear to me in the form of this terror. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway.
But his Danish critic attacked him for being the most consistent system-builder among system-builders. None of these essays is narrowly focused on any minor issue or local question; instead each one concerns a major point, generally one unscuentific has implications for understanding the Postscript as a whole or even more broadly, the Climacan authorship.